Tell The New York Times: Restore fundamental rights to your subscribers

The New York Times quietly added a forced arbitration clause to its terms of service, taking away the rights of subscribers to seek justice in the courts to address any disputes arising out of their policies.

If we generate a large enough public outcry, we can convince The New York Times to restore subscribers' day in court — and we can show other companies that people demand to have their fundamental rights respected.

Add your name to tell The New York Times: Remove the forced arbitration clause from your terms of service and protect the fundamental legal rights of your subscribers.

To The New York Times

Based on your own reporting, The New York Times should reject the use of arbitration clauses and class action waivers. Instead, you have quietly incorporated them into your terms of service.

It is not too late for you to reverse course and live up to your stated values. We request that you immediately strike the forced arbitration clause from your terms of service, because doing so is the fair and ethical thing to do.